Skip to content

Excellent Graffiti

January 20, 2009

“170 million tax dollars for an inauguration?!? Is he really America’s economic solution?”

Spelled correctly?  Proper punctuation?  Bizarre.

5 Comments leave one →
  1. delaney55 permalink
    January 21, 2009 12:27 am

    Okay, what about the cost of Bush’s two inaugurations? Why should Obama not have had one? We weren’t in the best financial straights when Bush got his second term yet there was still an inauguration ceremony and party afterward. Americans needed this today and if it were McCain up there instead, would you all be gripping?

  2. Michele permalink*
    January 21, 2009 8:35 am

    Gripping what?

  3. January 21, 2009 1:23 pm

    Well we can rule out gripping reality.

    Anyway the cost of bushes two might be higher but the cost of one of Bush’s was less. Plus it makes sense that bush spent a little more money since he was elected twice so had to do this twice. You get the point now?

  4. Michele permalink*
    January 21, 2009 1:46 pm

    I find it all amusing because those on the Left were incredibly critical of Bush’s second inaugural because they felt it was unseemly to have a big expensive celebration while our country was at war in Iraq. These same people are more than happy to join in the partying for Obama even in the midst of an economic crisis.

    And what’s with all of the celebrities?!

  5. January 21, 2009 6:15 pm

    Sorry I was wrong the cost of both Bush’s inaugurations was lower the Obama’s. If you don’t believe me look it up for yourself.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.