<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Postville Immigration Bust</title>
	<atom:link href="http://becausenooneasked.com/2008/05/26/the-postville-immigration-bust/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://becausenooneasked.com/2008/05/26/the-postville-immigration-bust/</link>
	<description>"Shouldn't you two be doing laundry?"                For the anti-jihadist and internet shopping aficionado.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 02:07:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Do you think the government should enforce the law? &#171; Because No One Asked</title>
		<link>http://becausenooneasked.com/2008/05/26/the-postville-immigration-bust/#comment-2050</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Do you think the government should enforce the law? &#171; Because No One Asked]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 06:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://becausenooneasked.wordpress.com/?p=642#comment-2050</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] &#124; &#160;  Discussion question posed by a moderator in a Des Moines Register forum about the Postville immigration raid: What do you think of federal immigration authorities targeting Iowa workplaces in search of [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] | &nbsp;  Discussion question posed by a moderator in a Des Moines Register forum about the Postville immigration raid: What do you think of federal immigration authorities targeting Iowa workplaces in search of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michele</title>
		<link>http://becausenooneasked.com/2008/05/26/the-postville-immigration-bust/#comment-2026</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michele]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 00:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://becausenooneasked.wordpress.com/?p=642#comment-2026</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who are you responding to?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who are you responding to?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucia Patino</title>
		<link>http://becausenooneasked.com/2008/05/26/the-postville-immigration-bust/#comment-2025</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lucia Patino]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 23:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://becausenooneasked.wordpress.com/?p=642#comment-2025</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[close-minded coments from close-minded minds. Proud of only knowing part of the picture, but eager to tell everyone the truth. You are not worth a response...No, you don&#039;t get it!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>close-minded coments from close-minded minds. Proud of only knowing part of the picture, but eager to tell everyone the truth. You are not worth a response&#8230;No, you don&#8217;t get it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Murphy</title>
		<link>http://becausenooneasked.com/2008/05/26/the-postville-immigration-bust/#comment-1510</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pete Murphy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 21:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://becausenooneasked.wordpress.com/?p=642#comment-1510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rampant population growth threatens our economy and quality of life.  Immigration, both legal and illegal, are fueling this growth.  I&#039;m not talking just about the obvious problems that we see in the news - growing dependence on foreign oil, carbon emissions, soaring commodity prices, environmental degradation, etc.  I&#039;m talking about the effect upon rising unemployment and poverty in America.  

I am the author of &quot;Five Short Blasts:  A New Economic Theory Exposes The Fatal Flaw in Globalization and Its Consequences for America.&quot;  To make a long story short, as population density rises beyond some optimum level, per capita consumption of products begins to decline out of the need to conserve space.  People who live in crowded conditions simply don’t have enough space to use and store many products.  This declining per capita consumption, in the face of rising productivity (per capita output, which always rises), inevitably yields rising unemployment and poverty. 

This theory has huge implications for U.S. policy toward population management, especially immigration policy.  Our policies of encouraging high rates of immigration are rooted in the belief of economists that population growth is a good thing, fueling economic growth.  Through most of human history, the interests of the common good and business (corporations) were both well-served by continuing population growth.  For the common good, we needed more workers to man our factories, producing the goods needed for a high standard of living.  This population growth translated into sales volume growth for corporations.  Both were happy.  

But, once an optimum population density is breached, their interests diverge.  It is in the best interest of the common good to stabilize the population, avoiding an erosion of our quality of life through high unemployment and poverty.  However, it is still in the interest of corporations to fuel population growth because, even though per capita consumption goes into decline, total consumption still increases.  We now find ourselves in the position of having corporations and economists influencing public policy in a direction that is not in the best interest of the common good.  

The U.N. ranks the U.S. with eight other countries - India, Pakistan, Nigeria, Democratic Republic of Congo, Bangladesh, Uganda, Ethiopia and China - as accounting for fully half of the world’s population growth by 2050.  The U.S. is the only developed country still experiencing third world-like population growth, most of which is due to immigration.   It&#039;s absolutely imperative that our population be stabilized, and that&#039;s impossible without dramatically reining in immigration, both legal and illegal.

If you’re interested in learning more about this important new economic theory, I invite you to visit my web site at OpenWindowPublishingCo.com where you can read the preface for free, join in my blog discussion and, of course, purchase the book if you like.  (It&#039;s also available at Amazon.com.)

Pete Murphy
Author, Five Short Blasts]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rampant population growth threatens our economy and quality of life.  Immigration, both legal and illegal, are fueling this growth.  I&#8217;m not talking just about the obvious problems that we see in the news &#8211; growing dependence on foreign oil, carbon emissions, soaring commodity prices, environmental degradation, etc.  I&#8217;m talking about the effect upon rising unemployment and poverty in America.  </p>
<p>I am the author of &#8220;Five Short Blasts:  A New Economic Theory Exposes The Fatal Flaw in Globalization and Its Consequences for America.&#8221;  To make a long story short, as population density rises beyond some optimum level, per capita consumption of products begins to decline out of the need to conserve space.  People who live in crowded conditions simply don’t have enough space to use and store many products.  This declining per capita consumption, in the face of rising productivity (per capita output, which always rises), inevitably yields rising unemployment and poverty. </p>
<p>This theory has huge implications for U.S. policy toward population management, especially immigration policy.  Our policies of encouraging high rates of immigration are rooted in the belief of economists that population growth is a good thing, fueling economic growth.  Through most of human history, the interests of the common good and business (corporations) were both well-served by continuing population growth.  For the common good, we needed more workers to man our factories, producing the goods needed for a high standard of living.  This population growth translated into sales volume growth for corporations.  Both were happy.  </p>
<p>But, once an optimum population density is breached, their interests diverge.  It is in the best interest of the common good to stabilize the population, avoiding an erosion of our quality of life through high unemployment and poverty.  However, it is still in the interest of corporations to fuel population growth because, even though per capita consumption goes into decline, total consumption still increases.  We now find ourselves in the position of having corporations and economists influencing public policy in a direction that is not in the best interest of the common good.  </p>
<p>The U.N. ranks the U.S. with eight other countries &#8211; India, Pakistan, Nigeria, Democratic Republic of Congo, Bangladesh, Uganda, Ethiopia and China &#8211; as accounting for fully half of the world’s population growth by 2050.  The U.S. is the only developed country still experiencing third world-like population growth, most of which is due to immigration.   It&#8217;s absolutely imperative that our population be stabilized, and that&#8217;s impossible without dramatically reining in immigration, both legal and illegal.</p>
<p>If you’re interested in learning more about this important new economic theory, I invite you to visit my web site at OpenWindowPublishingCo.com where you can read the preface for free, join in my blog discussion and, of course, purchase the book if you like.  (It&#8217;s also available at Amazon.com.)</p>
<p>Pete Murphy<br />
Author, Five Short Blasts</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

